MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116977493 · doi:10.1109/iceei.2011.6021679

Sensitive loads voltage improvement using Dynamic Voltage Restorer

2011· article· en· W2116977493 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Nasser Tandjaoui, Chellali Benachaıba, Othmane Abdelkhalek, Mamadou Lamine Doumbia, Youssef Mouloudi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageComputer scienceQuality (philosophy)Relevance (law)Power qualityElectric energyElectric powerLow voltageVoltage regulationElectric power qualityPower (physics)Electric power distributionElectrical engineeringReliability engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High quality energy is necessary to end-users domestic or industrial customers of the public electric distribution networks. The quality of the electric power is characterized by the measurement and the analysis of the electric disturbances which make it possible to understand the origin of the disturbances, to evaluate their impact on the sensitive equipment, and thus to find and choose the most suitable solution either economically or technically. This paper aims to introduce the possible relevance of the evolution of the intervention function of a DVR (Dynamic Voltage Restorer) as a new technique to reduce and/or attenuate the various electric defects in voltage influencing the quality of energy supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207