Call-level and packet-level performance modeling in cellular CDMA networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a queueing analytical model to evaluate call-level and packet-level performances for uplink transmission of data calls in a voice/data cellular CDMA network. In the call-level, call admission control (CAC) is used to ensure that the cell is not overloaded and also to prioritize the handoff calls over the new calls. We assume finite queueing at the mobile to buffer the data packets for uplink transmission. The transmission rates for data calls can be adjusted to accommodate more voice and/or data calls while satisfying a minimum signal-to-interference (SIR)/rate requirement for voice/data calls. Call-level performance measures (i.e., new call blocking and handoff call dropping probabilities) for both voice and data calls and packet-level performance measures (i.e., queue throughput, packet dropping probability and delay) specifically for data calls can be obtained from our model. Impacts of the call-level parameter settings on the packet-level performance measures are investigated and typical numerical results are presented
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it