MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116981616 · doi:10.7202/016983ar

L’intervention en soutien à l’empowerment

2008· article· fr· W2116981616 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Louise Lemay

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEmpowermentSociologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ empowerment se situe au coeur du discours dans de nombreux domaines de la vie sociale. Le modèle suscite l’engouement, voire domine. Toutefois, son application tous azimuts questionne. Après un survol du concept, l’article porte sur les stratégies généralement prescrites en soutien à l’ empowerment individuel ou collectif et les paradoxes rencontrés quand il s’agit de promouvoir la prise de décision autonome des personnes. L’examen critique des écrits révèle l’importance d’étudier les rapports de pouvoir entre intervenants et clients et leurs effets sur la prise de pouvoir des clients sur l’intervention : une condition au renouvellement démocratique des pratiques d’ empowermen t.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207