MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116988824 · doi:10.1109/tim.2014.2299524

Secondary Peak Detection of PPG Signal for Continuous Cuffless Arterial Blood Pressure Measurement

2014· article· en· W2116988824 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaochuan He, Rafik Goubran

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramSIGNAL (programming language)Blood pressureComputer scienceMedicinePulse (music)Biomedical engineeringInternal medicineDetectorComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The arterial blood pressure (ABP) is one of the most important physiological parameters for health monitoring. Most of the blood measurement devices in the market determine the ABP through the inflation and the deflation of a cuff controlled by a bladder. This method is very uncomfortable for most of the users and may even cause anxiety, which in turn can affect the blood pressure (BP) (white coat syndrome). This paper investigates a cuffless nonintrusive approach to estimate the BP. The main idea is to measure the pulse transit time (PTT), i.e., the delay between the R-peak of the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal and the following peak of the finger photoplethysmograph (PPG) signal. The main problem of this approach is that when the dicrotic notch of the PPG signal is unobservable, the position and the amplitude of the main peak of the PPG signal will be changed. As a result, the correlation between the BP and the PTT can be affected. To overcome this problem, three types of secondary peak detection methods are designed to reveal the secondary peak from the original PPG signal. Actual ECG, PPG, and the BP measurements extracted from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database that contains clinical signal data reflecting real measurements are used. The results verify that the proposed detection methods improve the correlation relationship between the BP and the PTT, and demonstrate that the adjusted PTT can be used as an indicator of the ABP by removing the dicrotic notch impact on the PPG signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207