Bibliographic record
Abstract
El soberanismo quebequense ha perdido empuje. La aspiracion de que la mayoritariamente francofona provincia canadiense de Quebec se declarase soberana tuvo su apogeo en la primera mitad de los anos 1990s, para luego comenzar a declinar. En las elecciones de 2003, el soberanista Partido Quebequense, que detentaba el gobierno provincial desde 1994, fue derrotado por el Partido Liberal de Quebec. Este ultimo sostiene una postura federalista, o sea de buenas relaciones con la federacion canadiense. En la provincia de Quebec, las transformaciones demograficas, la incertidumbre economica debida a su posible separacion de Canada, y la fatiga ciudadana generada por el constante conflicto politico alrededor de la soberania, son algunas de las razones de la (relativa) perdida de apoyo al soberanismo. Por anadidura, en el resto de Canada ha disminuido en gran medida la receptividad habida en anos anteriores hacia la causa soberanista. Salvo acontecimientos imprevisibles, parece ser que Quebec seguira formando parte de la federacion canadiense, no tanto por imposicion de esta ultima, sino por insuficiente apoyo popular a la soberania dentro de la propia Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".