MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117031306 · doi:10.1139/o09-004

Structure of the antigenic repeating pentasaccharide unit of the LPS O-polysaccharide of <i>Cronobacter sakazakii</i> implicated in the Tennessee outbreak

2009· article· en· W2117031306 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Leann L. MacLean, Franco Pagotto, Jeffrey M. Farber, Malcolm B. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCronobacter sakazakiiOutbreakMicrobiologyPolysaccharideAntigenBiologyChemistryVirologyBiochemistryInfant formulaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strains of the Gram-negative bacterium Cronobacter (Enterobacter) sakazakii have been identified as emerging opportunistic pathogens that can cause enterocolitis, bacteraemia, meningitis, and brain abscess, and have been particularly associated with meningitis in neonates where infant-milk formulae has been epidemiologically linked to the disease. A study of the lipopolysaccharides produced by clinical isolates using chemical, 2D 1H and 13C NMR, and MS methods revealed that the O-polysaccharide produced by C. sakazakii (3290), a clinical strain from the Tennessee outbreak, was a branched polymer of repeating pentasaccharide units composed of 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-galactose, 3-(N-acetyl-L-alanylamido)-3-deoxy-D-quinovose, D-glucuronic acid, and D-glucose present in the molar ratio 1:1:1:2 and had the structure:<div class="absequation"><img src="/cisti/journals/rp/gifs/o09-004s1h.gif" /></div>The O-PS structure provides a unique specific structurally defined marker for the clinical tracking of this pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter ResearchFrench-language works237,207