MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117036448 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/not064

Spontaneous loss of heterozygosity leading to homozygous R132H in a patient-derived IDH1 mutant cell line

2013· letter· en· W2117036448 on OpenAlexaff
H. Artee Luchman, C. Chesnelong, J. Gregory Cairncross, Samuel Weiss

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoss of heterozygosityMutantIDH1Line (geometry)GeneticsBiologyGeneMathematicsAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor, We report a novel follow-up observation pertaining to “An in vivo patient-derived model of endogenous IDH1-mutant glioma,” which was recently published in Neuro-Oncology.1 Since publication, we have observed the gradual and repeated loss of the wild-type IDH1 allele in vitro with retention of the mutant allele. Sequencing of IDH1 exon 4 from 3 independent late passage cultures showed homozygosity for the R132H allele (mut/-), whereas both mutant and wild-type alleles were present in the original line (mut/wt) and tumor (Fig. 1A). In addition, a decreased copy number was seen at the IDH locus, consistent with loss of the IDH1 wild-type allele (Fig. 1B). The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) has independently observed this phenomenon in BT142. The ATCC is preparing to distribute the BT142 mut/-,2 while we test conditions that best preserve the heterozygous phenotype. Loss of heterozygosity in favor of the mutant allele of IDH1 correlates with a decreased copy number of the IDH1 locus. (a) IDH sequencing on the IDH1-mutant anaplastic oligoastrocytoma and derived IDHmt brain tumor stem cell line (BT142). (b) Copy number assay of the IDH1 locus on heterozygote and homozygote BT142. The loss of the wild-type allele has been reported in vivo in patients and has been shown to be similar to phenotypically wild-type IDH, resulting in decreased 2-hydroxyglutarate production,3,4 also observed in the BT142 mut/- line. This unforeseen change leading to a second cell line will be valuable for comparisons of the implications of mutant and wild-type IDH phenotypes on proliferation, tumorigenicity, and therapeutic resistance in a syngeneic setting. Sequencing for IDH1 was performed as previously described.1 The TaqMan Copy Number Assay (Applied Biosystems) was used to assess copy-number variations. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen) and quantified using UV absorbance (A260/A280 ratio >1.7). The genomic DNA samples were diluted to 5 ng/μL in nuclease-free water; 20 ng of genomic DNA was mixed with the IDH1 TaqMan Copy Number Assay and the RNase P Reference Assay in a PCR plate, and quantitative real-time PCR was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The manufacturer's software, Copy Caller, was used for analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0110.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207