MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117046140 · doi:10.1002/path.2976

A Ki67/BCL2 index based on immunohistochemistry is highly prognostic in ER‐positive breast cancer

2011· article· en· W2117046140 on OpenAlex
H. Raza Ali, Sarah‐Jane Dawson, Fiona M. Blows, Elena Provenzano, Samuel Leung, Torsten O. Nielsen, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Carlos Caldas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersCancer Research UKCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSanofi
KeywordsOncologyHazard ratioBreast cancerNottingham Prognostic IndexMedicineTissue microarrayInternal medicineProportional hazards modelConfidence intervalEstrogen receptorImmunohistochemistryCohortProgesterone receptorMultivariate analysisCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an urgent need to improve prognostic classifiers in breast cancer. Ki67 and B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (BCL2) are established prognostic markers which have traditionally been assessed separately, in a dichotomous manner. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that combinatorial assessment of these markers would provide superior prognostic information and improve their clinical utility. Tissue microarrays were used to assess the expression of Ki67 and BCL2 in 2749 cases of invasive breast cancer. We devised a Ki67/BCL2 index representing the relative expression of each protein and assessed its association with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Based on our findings, an independent cohort of 3992 cases was used to validate the prognostic significance of the Ki67/BCL2 index. All survival analyses were conducted on complete data as well as data where missing values were resolved using multiple imputation. This study complied with reporting recommendations for tumour marker prognostic studies (REMARK) criteria. The Ki67/BCL2 index showed a significant association with BCSS at 10 years in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. In multivariate analysis, adjusting for major clinical and molecular markers, the Ki67/BCL2 index retained prognostic significance, robustly classifying cases into three risk groups [intermediate- versus low-risk hazard ratio (HR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.0-2.0; p = 0.031; high- versus low-risk HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0; p = 0.005]. This finding was validated in an independent cohort of 3992 tumours containing 2761 ER-positive tumours (intermediate- versus low-risk HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; p < 0.001; high- versus low-risk HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9; p < 0.001). Ki67 and BCL2 can be effectively combined to produce an index which is an independent predictor of BCSS in ER-positive breast cancer, enhancing their potential prognostic utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it