Identité, diversité et nation dans les musées d’ethnographie en Croatie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pendant que la majorité des musées ethnologiques occidentaux cherchent de nouvelles approches au traitement de la diversité culturelle, et ceci non seulement dans les Amériques issues en grande partie de l’immigration en provenant d’une variété de cultures, mais aussi dans les État-nations européens, les musées dans les pays postcommunistes se concentrent sur les études d’une culture nationale. Cependant, il faudrait apporter des nuances à cette dichotomie réductrice qui s’impose au premier regard. En fait, c’est le piège dans lequel tombent le plus souvent les auteurs qui traitent des pays postcommunistes, car ils conservent cette attitude issue de la guerre froide de les observer en bloc et en opposition. En effet, la situation est plus complexe car on y trouve des pratiques et des approches diverses à la fois entre les pays et entre les institutions muséales d’un même pays. Nous aborderons cette problématique en utilisant les exemples des musées ethnographique de Croatie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".