MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117073511 · doi:10.2991/ijndc.2014.2.2.5

Multi-Objective Optimization for Milling Operations using Genetic Algorithms under Various Constraints

2014· article· en· W2117073511 on OpenAlex
Libao An, Peiqing Yang, Hong Zhang, Mingyuan Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œInternational journal of networked and distributed computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsCollège de MaisonneuveConcordia University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceGenetic algorithmMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the parameter optimization problem for face-milling operations is studied.A multi-objective mathematical model is developed with the purpose to minimize the unit production cost and total machining time while maximize the profit rate.The unwanted material is removed by one finishing pass and at least one roughing passes depending on the total depth of cut.Maximum and minimum allowable cutting speeds, feed rates and depths of cut, as well as tool life, surface roughness, cutting force and cutting power consumption are constraints of the model.Optimal values of objective function and corresponding machining parameters are found by Genetic Algorithms.An example is presented to illustrate the model and solution method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it