Clothing Air Gap Layers and Thermal Protective Performance in Single Layer Garment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A three-dimensional body scanning technique is used to measure the air gap layer distribution between different-sized protective garments and the body of a manikin used to evaluate garment thermal protective performance. The influence of fabric material and garment size on the manikin skin-clothing air gap layers existing in single layer thermally protective coveralls is analyzed. Protective performance of these garments is evaluated using the Manikin Thermal Protective Clothing Analysis System. Relationships between the burn patterns, measured on a flash fire manikin and measured manikin-garment air gap layers, are examined. The effects of thermally induced shrinkage as a result of flash fire exposure are discussed in comparisons between single layer protective coverall clothing made with heat resistant fabrics. An established numerical model is used to forecast the dimensions of skin-clothing air gap for optimum thermal protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it