MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117080720 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.43.4.1305

THE CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF DETRITAL CHROMIAN SPINEL FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN ALPS AND OUTER DINARIDES: THE DISCRIMINATION OF SUPPLIES FROM AREAS OF SIMILAR TECTONIC SETTING?

2005· article· en· W2117080720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Davide Lenaz, Francesco Princivalle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySpinelTectonicsGeochemistryMineralogySeismologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromian spinel is a common heavy mineral in the fl ysch basins of the southeastern Alps and Outer Dinarides. Various tectonic settings have been found for the suites of chromian spinel studied herein, related to suprasubduction for both Internal and Outer Dinarides, and ocean-fl oor-spreading zones for the Outer Dinarides. Because the composition of the chromian spinel cannot discriminate between the two areas, we performed crystallochemical studies in order to fi nd some differences. These studies show that it is possible to discriminate between the suprasubduction zones of the Outer and Inner Dinarides by means of the positional parameter u of the oxygen atom, which is close to 0.2625 for spinel grains from Outer Dinarides and greater than 0.2626 for spinel grains from Inner Dinarides. Intracrystalline temperatures ranging from 790 to 1050°C have been calculated for spinels with u close to 0.2625, and 730 to 750°C for those with u higher than 0.2626. These temperatures are consistent with those calculated for Outer and Inner Dinarides, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207