MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117090607 · doi:10.4000/ere.4200

Réapprendre à habiter ici et entre nous : une éducation centrée sur les lieux et la communauté

2005· article· fr· W2117090607 on OpenAlex
Tom Berryman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉducation relative à l environnement · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans une perspective philosophique et historique, cet article débute en soulignant l’intérêt de renouer avec des pratiques éducatives où les voies d’entrée se font à partir de croisements entre lieu et communauté. L’intérêt de telles entrées bien localisées s’explique notamment à l’aune d’un possible désenchantement face à une voie d’entrée relativement similaire, mais plus planétaire, totalisante et globalisante : la « communauté » de tous les êtres humains d’un « lieu » gigantesque, la planète. La critique des émergences totalisantes invite à de nécessaires et difficiles réenracinements. Ce texte propose quelques éléments de clarification des notions de communauté et de lieu. À partir de ces ancrages, l’article explore la notion d’éducation relative à l’environnement centrée sur la communauté et sur les lieux, d’abord à partir de définitions puis à partir de certaines pratiques. Ceci permet de souligner des contrastes avec d’autres approches d’éducation relative à l’environnement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it