Synthesis and Properties of Oligonucleotide Chimeras Containing 5′-Amino-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoroarabinonucleosides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oligonucleotide analogues comprised of 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-beta-D-arabinose units joined via P3'-N5' phosphoramidate linkages (2'F-ANA(5'N)) were prepared for the first time. Among the compounds prepared were a series of 2'OMe-RNA-[GAP]-2'OMe-RNA 'chimeras', whereby the "GAP" consisted of DNA, DNA(5'N), 2'F-ANA or 2'F-ANA(5'N) segments. The chimeras with the 2'F-ANA and DNA gaps exhibited the highest affinity towards a complementary RNA target, followed by the 5'-amino derivatives, i.e., 2'F-ANA > DNA > 2'F-ANA(5'N) > DNA(5'N). Importantly, hybrids between these chimeras and target RNA were all substrates of both human RNase HII and E. coli RNase HI. In terms of efficiency of the chimera in recruiting the bacterial enzyme, the following order was observed: gap DNA > 2'F-ANA > 2'F-ANA(5'N) > DNA(5'N). The corresponding relative rates observed with the human enzyme were: gap DNA > 2'F-ANA(5'N) > 2'F-ANA > DNA(5'N).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".