MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117116343 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2011.2109734

On the Number of Noise Parameters for Analyses of Circuits With MOSFETs

2011· article· en· W2117116343 on OpenAlex
Leonid Belostotski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Electronic circuitElectronic engineeringMOSFETNoise measurementNoise temperatureEffective input noise temperatureNoise figureLow-noise amplifierMathematicsAmplifierElectrical engineeringNoise reductionComputer scienceCMOSEngineeringPhase noiseTransistorVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inequality relating F <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">min</sub> and Lange invariant N for any noisy linear two-port network has been known since the 1980s. However, the applicability of this inequality to MOSFETs is not discussed in the literature, and thus, this inequality is not normally treated in analyses and designs of circuits based on MOSFETs. This work shows that by using N, the number of noise parameters required to model high-frequency noise of intrinsic MOSFETs can be reduced by one. This reduction in the noise parameters simplifies the noise correlation matrices, which leads to simpler noise factor expressions. A new set of noise correlation matrices and noise factor expressions is presented. These are expected to ease circuit optimizations of low-noise amplifiers and other circuits based on intrinsic MOSFET models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it