MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117128923 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.12387

Adrian Velicu, Civic Catechisms and Reason in the French Revolution

2012· article· fr· W2117128923 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Charles Buttier

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrench revolutionPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adrian Velicu a choisi d’étu­­dier en paral­­lèle les caté­­chismes poli­­tiques édi­­tés pen­­dant la Révo­­lu­­tion fran­­çaise et l’usage du concept de Rai­­son à cette période. L’auteur, maître de confé­­rences au dépar­­te­­ment d’His­­toire des Idées de l’Uni­­ver­­sité de Karlstad, n’est pas un spé­­cia­­liste de la Révo­­lu­­tion fran­­çaise. Il avait cepen­­dant déjà étu­­dié ce genre de la lit­­té­­ra­­ture poli­­tique dans un article de 2001 : Civic catechisms and Reason during th...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207