Long-term photometric monitoring of Messier 5 variables - I. Period changes of RR Lyrae stars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The period changes of 86 M5 RR Lyrae stars have been investigated on a 100-yr time base. The published observations have been supplemented by archival Asiago, Konkoly and Las Campanas photographic observations obtained between 1952 and 1993. About two-thirds of the O − C diagrams could be fitted by a straight line or a parabola. 21 RR Lyrae stars have increasing, 18 decreasing and 16 constant period. The mean rates of period change of these variables are: . 10 RR Lyrae stars show fast period decrease with . At least some of these variables may be in the pre-zero-age horizontal-branch (ZAHB) evolutionary stage. The variables on the long-period sequence of the period–amplitude diagram are brighter than the other RR Lyrae stars of M5 and are in an advanced evolutionary stage moving off from the HB redward. More than one-third of the M5 RR Lyrae stars investigated have irregular period change. The irregular period behaviour is relatively more frequent among the RRc (RR1) stars (50 per cent) than among the RRab (RR0) stars (34 per cent). A strict relationship has been found between the irregular period change and the Blazhko effect of M5 RRab stars. This fact indicates a common origin for these phenomena. It is remarkable that, if the RRab stars showing Blazhko effect are omitted from the sample, the mean rates of the period change have small positive values (〈β〉= 0.012 ± 0.147 d Myr-1, 〈α〉= 0.013 ± 0.279 Myr−1), in excellent agreement with HB evolutionary model predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".