SQUEEZING, HIGHER-ORDER SQUEEZING, PHOTON-BUNCHING AND PHOTON-ANTIBUNCHING IN A QUADRATIC HAMILTONIAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the assumption of strong (classical) pump condition, the coherent light interacting with a medium of second-order nonlinearity gives rise to a model represented by a quadratic Hamiltonian. By exploiting this model, we obtain the squeezing and the higher-order squeezing of the input coherent light. These phenomena are found to depend on the classical intensity but do not depend on the number of photons present in the input coherent radiation field. For the same physical model, it is found that the photons are bunched in the input vacuum field provided that two-photon processes dominate over one-photon processes. Depending on the suitable choice of phases and interaction time, we show both photon bunching and photon antibunching phenomena for the vacuum field and for the field with a large number of photons as well. The results obtained in this paper are completely analytical in nature and provide a feeling for the physical situation in an explicit manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it