MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117152753 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4649287

Assessment of vessel size by MRI in an orthotopic model of human pancreatic cancer

2008· article· en· W2117152753 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer A. Flexman, Andrew Yung, Donald T. Yapp, Sylvia S. W. Ng, Piotr Kozłowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic cancerMedicineBlood vesselBlood volumeCancerImaging biomarkerPathologyRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with no cure. Therapies that target the tumor vasculature are promising new treatment strategies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can non-invasively determine a vessel size index and a blood volume fraction to characterize the vascular compartment in a tumor. The changes in the T2 and T2* relaxation rate constants after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles are dependent on the size and morphology of tissue blood vessels. In this study, MRI was used to investigate changes in the tumor vasculature in an orthotopic primary human pancreatic cancer xenograft model during tumor progression. The SPIO contrast agent Feridex I.V. was first validated as an intravascular contrast agent over the course of the imaging session, and shown to remain in the blood for at least 1.5 h. The average vessel size index was not correlated to the tumor area within an image slice, but the average blood volume fraction was significantly and negatively correlated to the tumor area (p<0.05). Blood volume fraction may serve as a non-invasive biomarker for changes in the tumor vasculature due to tumor growth Further investigation is needed to evaluate this promising technique as a tool to monitor tumor vascular changes in response to antiangiogenic therapies in pancreatic cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207