MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117166902 · doi:10.1191/0267659105pf778oa

Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass

2005· article· en· W2117166902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerfusion · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary bypassAnesthesiaBolus (digestion)Blood samplingCardiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between high-intensity transient signals (HITS) and perfusionist interventions, purging techniques, pump flows and venous reservoir blood volume levels during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Transcranial Doppler was used to detect HITS in the middle cerebral artery during the period of aortic crossclamping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusionist-related interventions were recorded and included blood sampling (including the number of times that the oxygenator sampling manifold was purged), drug bolus injections and infusions (vasopressors, crystalloid and mannitol). Pump flows and venous reservoir volume levels were also documented. RESULTS: There were 534 interventions in 90 patients [median number of interventions per patient: 6 (quartiles: 4, 8)]. The median total HITS count from all interventions was 17 (5, 37). This represented 38% of the total HITS counts during aortic crossclamping. Factors contributing to differences in the HITS count included type of intervention (p <0.0001) and perfusionist (p =0.0012). Blood sampling (p<0.001) and drug bolus injections (p=0.06) had higher HITS counts per patient than infusions. Repetitive purging significantly increased HITS counts (r=0.74; p <0.001). Purging perfusionists (purging: 1-10 times) had higher HITS counts per patient [5 HITS (1, 15) than nonpurgers [0 HITS (0, 1) p <0.0001]. HITS counts were significantly correlated with reservoir volumes (r= -0.20, p=0.017) and pump flow rates (r=0.21, p =0.008). Reservoir volume levels < or =800 mL were associated with higher HITS counts per intervention [11 HITS (2, 27)] during blood sampling compared with higher volume levels [3 HITS (1, 10), p =0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral emboli associated with perfusionist interventions can be minimized by not purging the sampling manifold, using continuous infusions rather than bolus injections, and maintaining high blood-volume levels (>800mL) in the venous reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it