MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117178015 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4512

Thymocyte Sensitivity and Supramolecular Activation Cluster Formation Are Developmentally Regulated: A Partial Role for Sialylation

2003· article· en· W2117178015 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy K. Starr, Mark A. Daniëls, Michelle M. Lucido, Stephen C. Jameson, Kristin A. Hogquist

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsThymocyteT-cell receptorCell biologyCD8T cellBiologyChemistryGlycosylationBiochemistryAntigenImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TCR reactivity is tuned during thymic development. Immature thymocytes respond to low-affinity self-ligands resulting in positive selection. Following differentiation, T cells no longer respond to low-affinity ligands, but respond well to high-affinity (foreign) ligands. We show in this study that this response includes integrin activation, supramolecular activation cluster formation, Ca(2+) flux, and CD69 expression. Because glycosylation patterns are known to change during T cell development, we tested whether alterations in sialylation influence CD8 T cell sensitivity to low affinity TCR ligands. Using neuraminidase treatment or genetic deficiency in the ST3Gal-I sialyltransferase, we show that desialylation of mature CD8 T cells enhances their sensitivity to low-affinity ligands, although these treatments do not completely recapitulate the dynamic range of immature T cells. These studies identify sialylation as one of the factors that regulate CD8 T cell tuning during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207