MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117195560 · doi:10.1126/science.1233066

Unraveling the Mechanism of Protein Disaggregation Through a ClpB-DnaK Interaction

2013· article· en· W2117195560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCLPBMechanism (biology)BiophysicsChemistryComputational biologyCell biologyBiologyHeat shock proteinBiochemistryPhysicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissecting Disaggregation The excessive accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates can overwhelm the cell's "quality control" machinery, leading to cell death. The yeast Hsp104 protein and its bacterial homolog ClpB are molecular chaperones that can "rescue" aggregated proteins by coupling the force generated from adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis to the progressive unfolding and threading of extended polypeptide segments through axial channels in these large molecular machines. Unfolded polypeptides emerging from the channel are refolded with the aid of a second chaperone system, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. DnaK also plays an important role in bringing regions of polypeptides within aggregates to ClpB to begin the solubilization process. Rosenzweig et al. (p. 1080 , published online 7 February; see the Perspective by Saibil ) describe a nuclear magnetic resonance–derived structure of the ClpB-DnaK complex, and verified it through mutagenesis and functional assays. The work clarifies the roles of each of the molecular players in the disaggregation reaction and provides a structural basis for the DnaK-ClpB interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it