Erosion Resistance of Thick Nitride and Carbonitride Coatings Deposited using Plasma Enhanced Magnetron Sputtering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we report the microstructural and erosion test results of thick coatings deposited using a PEMS technique. Nitrides (TiN, CrN, and ZrN) and nanocomposite carbonitride (TiSiCN) were deposited on Ti-6Al-4V disk coupon and turbine blade samples. The samples were analyzed using SEM with energy dispersive EDS, nanoindentation, and XRD. Selected samples were subjected to alumina erosion tests separately using two incident angles (30° and 90°, respectively). The nanohardness of the nitride coatings was 30 GPa for carbonitride. It was observed that at 30° TiSiCN renders the best erosion resistance. At 90° incidence, the erosion damage becomes more severe. However, one TiSiCN sample still showed an order of magnitude improved erosion resistance over the commercial TiN while delamination occurred on other samples. The delamination is believed to be the result of high internal stress of the TiSiCN coatings. A multilayered TiSiCN/Ti coating is proposed to maintain the high erosion resistance while reducing the internal stress. It is believed that this technology, once fully developed, may be applied to protect turbine engine blades and vanes from both solid particle erosion (SPE) and liquid droplet erosion (LDE) as well as piston rings of heavy-duty diesel engines from wear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it