MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117239355 · doi:10.1029/2002ja009359

Ion and neutral motions observed in the winter polar upper atmosphere

2002· article· en· W2117239355 on OpenAlexaff
R. A. Heelis, D. J. McEwen, W. Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoonSolar windIonPhysicsEnergetic neutral atomPolarAtmosphere (unit)Atmospheric sciencesInterplanetary magnetic fieldIonosphereEnvironmental scienceGeophysicsAtomic physicsPlasmaMeteorologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous samples of the ion drift are made near 800‐km altitude from the DMSP satellite and compared with remote measurements of the F region neutral winds made from the ground at Eureka in the northern polar cap. These measurements are compared with each other and with variations in the interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind. Over a 6‐day period, linear relationships between the north‐south component of the IMF and the noon‐midnight components of the ion and neutral drifts are used to determine the response times of the gas motions to changes in the solar wind driver. When the IMF is southward or weakly northward, the ion and neutral gas response begins almost immediately following a change in the solar wind driver. The time constant for the ion response is about 20 min, while for an F peak density of about 5 × 105 cm−3 the neutral time constant is 75 min. While significant variability exists, the 55‐min time difference between the response times is consistent with the neutral‐ion collision time prevailing in the F region at the time and location of the measurements. In the quasi‐equilibrium state, antisunward ion drifts in excess of 150 m s−1 drive the neutral gas antisunward with speeds about 60% of the ion drift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207