MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117247368 · doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5962909

Adaptive Resource Allocation in OFDMA Relay Networks with Network Coding

2011· article· en· W2117247368 on OpenAlexaff
Hanhua Zhao, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingLinear network codingRayleigh fadingComputer networkResource allocationRelayLink adaptationFrequency-division multiple accessFadingBit error rateTransmitter power outputCoding (social sciences)Channel (broadcasting)Power (physics)TransmitterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the user and channel diversity in OFDMA wireless systems with network coding. In particular, the paper introduces an adaptive resource allocation scheme to minimize the total transmit power while maintaining a required end-to-end BER. The proposed adaptive sub-carrier allocation scheme de-couples the bit loading of the network coded OFDMA system into three independent bit loadings on three OFDM links. This approach allows the deployment of a conventional bit loading algorithm for OFDM on individual links. The simulation results show that, in frequency selective Rayleigh fading channels, the proposed low-complexity resource allocation scheme can significantly reduce the total power consumption in the network and maintain a targeted BER.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207