MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117260013 · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1530280

A generalized Mumford-Shah model for roof-edge detection

2005· article· en· W2117260013 on OpenAlexaff
Tien D. Bui, Song Gao, Qinghui Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiecewiseSegmentationRoofContrast (vision)Artificial intelligenceEdge detectionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer scienceMinificationImage segmentationConstant (computer programming)Energy (signal processing)Image (mathematics)MathematicsComputer visionAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematical optimizationImage processingStatisticsMathematical analysisEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we have generalized the Mumford-Shah (MS) model to detect roof edges. It is found that many previous models cannot detect edges with low contrast. We have studied a variety of different models of energy minimization a la Mumford-Shah approach for image segmentation. The model proposed in this paper is better than the classical piecewise constant approximation since it can detect the low contrast edges of objects. The validity of the new model is demonstrated by experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207