MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2117274492

Understanding Domestic Service through Oral History and the Census: The Case of Grand Falls, Newfoundland

2000· article· en· W2117274492 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Rusty Neal, Jane Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnologyCensusSociologyHumanitiesEthnic groupGender studiesImmigrationAnthropologyPolitical sciencePopulationDemographyLawArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper highlights some of the methodological, ethical, and interpretive issues that emerged in researching the self-definition of women who migrated from coastal communities to work as domestic servants in a Newfoundland mill town in the 1920s and 1930s. It considers the ways in which manuscript census data and oral history -- the two main sources used in the research -- are comparable sources if we understand them to be products of human interaction, shaped by relationships of inequality between men and women, between women of different socio-economic or ethnic backgrounds (i.e., enumerator and enumerated, or researcher and researched), and by the specific historical circumstances of their creation. Cet article met en evidence certaines des questions methodologiques, ethiques, et interpretatives survenues lors dun travail de recherche sur l'autodefinition de femmes ayant emigre de communautes maritimes pour travailler comme domestiques dans un village moulinier Terre-Neuve dans les annees 1920 et 1930. II considere les facons dont les donnees de recensement manuscrites et l'histoire orale -- les deux sources principales ayant nourri la recherche - constituent des sources comparables si nous les envisageons comme etant le produit d'interactions humaines, prenant forme par le biais de rapports d'inegalite entre hommes et femmes, entre femmes de differents milieux socioeconomiques ou ethniques (ex. enumerateur et enumere, chercheure et sujet), et selon les circonstances historiques specifiques entourant leur creation. Introduction Though the work of recent Canadian feminist, working-class, and social historians has revealed a great deal about the lives and experiences of previously neglected individuals and groups, our understanding of certain areas remains vague and incomplete. One area about which we have an insufficient understanding concerns the work and migration experiences of domestic servants, who by the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were primarily female and represented the largest job group of women wage earners. In 1891, around 41 per cent of all wage earning women worked as domestics in Canada, a percentage that dropped to around 18 per cent in 1921, rising again during the 1930s. (1) The case studies by Canadian women's historians such Marilyn Barber and Varpu Lindstrom Best, writing of domestic service in the 1980s, have demonstrated that most of these domestics were single working-class women, many of them immigrants from Britain and continental Europe (35 per cent in 1911), and others migrated from Canad a's rural regions to urban centres where they found situations. (2) This research also provided some initial insight into the variety of domestics' work experiences. While live-in domestics were generally isolated in the household, lacked worker protection, earned low wages, and were vulnerable to exploitation, their working conditions, wages, and experiences varied regionally and along ethnic lines. Equally important, the number of domestics in relation to the entire female workforce also varied regionally, depending on factors such as supply and demand and the availability of alternative forms of wage work for women. Notably, more Canadian and American feminist scholars have explored domestic service in the contemporary period than they have in historical terms. (3) These scholars, who are primarily social scientists, have generally written of domestics through the lens of immigration. At root of their interpretations has been a concern with the fact that despite transformations in the labour market, changing gender ideologies, capitalist restructuring, and the women's movement, domestic service has persisted into the present as women's work and continues to encompass relations of domination and subordination in many aspects of public policy, legislation, and in human relationships. A number of case studies by sociologists and anthropologists writing of paid domestic work in an international context, also in the contemporary period, have shown that it is no longer possible to assume a universal pattern for domestic service; it has followed, and continues to follow, the flow of capital and labour in a global economy. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist research→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→