MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117299283 · doi:10.1109/broadcom.2008.81

Low Cost Active Antenna Arrays – Dependence on Array Configuration

2008· article· en· W2117299283 on OpenAlex
Dan Busuioc, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Noise figurePhase shift moduleLow-noise amplifierElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAmplifierWirelessElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringInsertion lossBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active antenna arrays are very valuable in creating reconfigurable, low-cost, wireless point-to-point networks. These wireless links can be used for a variety of applications from high-speed Internet backbone to multi-media content delivery. The key technical element to a low-cost telecommunication system is to optimize the number of antenna elements and minimize the impact that front end system parameters such as gain, temperature, and noise figure have on the overall circuit. A formulation for general active array optimization is proposed, integrating front end elements such as low noise amplifier, phase shifter, and arbitrary feed networks. A generalized G/T formulation is discussed for active arrays. Tradeoff between module gain/size, feed losses, and amplifier gains/noise figures and their effect on the G/T and SNR of different arrays is shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207