MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117316039 · doi:10.1139/v10-103

Aggregation of zinc tetraphenylporphyrin characterized by ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy

2011· article· en· W2117316039 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Jaclyn A. O’Brien, Yin Lu, Emma N. Hooley, Kenneth P. Ghiggino, Ronald P. Steer, Matthew F. Paige

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundUniversity of Melbourne
KeywordsChemistryFluorescencePhotochemistryMoleculeExcited stateZincTetraphenylporphyrinExcimerSpectroscopyFluorescence spectroscopyPorphyrinOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aggregation of metalloporphyrins is believed to play a crucial role in the excited-state annihilation process known as triplet–triplet annihilation, which in turn has significant potential applications in photon upconversion schemes. In this work, the propensity of the water-soluble metalloporphyrin zinc (II) meso-tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine to undergo aggregation when adsorbed to glass cover slips was investigated by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. In proof-of-principle experiments, it was demonstrated (1) that individual molecules of the metalloporphyrin can be directly visualized in spite of their very weak fluorescence emission, and (2) that at low concentrations (10−8 mol/L), the molecule has a strong tendency to form multimolecular aggregates. A subset of the multimolecular aggregates shows a significant blue-shift in fluorescence emission, though at present the precise nature of the molecular aggregates remains unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207