Branching Competitive Learning Network: A Novel Self-Creating Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new self-creating model of a neural network in which a branching mechanism is incorporated with competitive learning. Unlike other self-creating models, the proposed scheme, called branching competitive learning (BCL), adopts a special node-splitting criterion, which is based mainly on the geometrical measurements of the movement of the synaptic vectors in the weight space. Compared with other self-creating and nonself-creating competitive learning models, the BCL network is more efficient to capture the spatial distribution of the input data and, therefore, tends to give better clustering or quantization results. We demonstrate the ability of the BCL model to appropriately estimate the cluster number in a data distribution, show its adaptability to nonstationary data inputs and, moreover, present a scheme leading to a multiresolution data clustering. Extensive experiments on vector quantization of image compression are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the BCL algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it