Hyperinsulinemia superimposed on insulin resistance does not elevate blood pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance in the development of hypertension is an area of much current interest. A central question that remains unanswered is whether exogenous hyperinsulinemia can elevate blood pressure (BP) in the presence of pre-existing insulin resistance. To examine this proposition, we studied the effects of chronic fructose feeding on plasma insulin levels and BP in insulin-resistant Zucker fatty rats and in lean (insulin-sensitive) controls. In addition, vascular responses to norepinephrine in aortae and mesenteric arteries were compared between groups. Zucker fatty rats were hyperinsulinemic, insulin-resistant, yet normotensive when compared with age-matched lean controls. Long term fructose feeding increased plasma insulin levels and BP in the lean group. Strikingly, the fatty rats remained refractory to fructose-induced increases in BP despite exaggeration of hyperinsulinemia. Vascular reactivity assessed in aortae and mesenteric arteries was comparable between groups. These data suggest that, in vivo, the mechanisms of hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension are not operative in the face of pre-existing insulin resistance in obese Zucker rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".