An AODV-improved routing based on power control in WiFi mesh networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most existing ad hoc routing protocols attempt to minimize the number of hops from source to destination pairs. These routing protocols are all designed under the assumption of using only single data rate in the wireless channel. One of the current trends in wireless communication (e.g., IEEE 802.11b) is to enable devices to operate using many different transmission rates in order to accommodate a wide range of channel conditions. This paper introduces a routing algorithm utilizing the multi-rate and multi-range capacity in WiFi (wireless fidelity) mesh networks. Since transmission rate is inversely proportional to transmission range and every range corresponds with a transmit power level, we propose selecting high data-rate route by adjusting the transmit power level when establishing the route. The characteristic of this method is power control, it discovers the required data-rate link within the transmission range through adjusting the transmit power to corresponding level. We show through simulation that the proposed technique improves the network throughput and minimizes the power consumption due to its utilization of multi-rate support from MAC and physical layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it