MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117378848 · doi:10.1109/robot.1998.677084

Inverse dynamics control of flexible-link manipulators using neural networks

2002· article· en· W2117378848 on OpenAlexaff
Heidar Ali Talebi, Rajni V. Patel, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsA priori and a posterioriControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkLink (geometry)Computer scienceInverse dynamicsPayload (computing)Position (finance)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceKinematicsControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental evaluation of the performance of neural network-based controllers for tip position tracking of flexible-link manipulators is presented. A modified output re-definition approach is utilized to overcome the problem caused by the non-minimum phase characteristic of the flexible-link system. This modification is based on using minimum a priori knowledge about the system dynamics. The modified output redefinition approach requires a priori knowledge about the linear model of the system and no a priori knowledge about the payload mass. Four different neural network schemes are proposed. The neural networks are trained and employed as online controllers. The four proposed neural network controllers are implemented on a single flexible-link experimental test-bed. Experimental and simulation results are presented to illustrate the advantages and improved performance of the proposed tip position tracking controllers over conventional PD-type controllers in the presence of unmodeled dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207