MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117439134 · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.1.1

The Ecological Paradigm of Mind and Its Implications for Psychotherapy

2007· article· en· W2117439134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of General Psychology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEmbodied and Extended Cognition
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParadigm shiftPsychologyRelevance (law)EpistemologyCognitive scienceEcologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the result of a tremendous cross-disciplinary effort, the past 20 years have witnessed huge advances in our understanding of the brain and of the brain's relationship to the mind. A new paradigm of the mind—an ecological paradigm, as Gregory Bateson called it in 1973—has fallen into place. The authors have begun to have a scientific, biologically grounded explanation of how the human brain–mind system works. Despite the likely relevance of this paradigm for psychotherapy, its uptake in the clinical literature has been uneven to date. Accordingly, this article aims to pique the interest of the psychotherapeutic community in the ecological paradigm as a whole, in hopes of stimulating wider discussion and research into its clinical aspects and consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it