MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117481481 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2010.5603998

Low-voltage dielectrophoretic platform for Lab-on-chip biosensing applications

2010· article· en· W2117481481 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Amine Miled, Christopher Moufawad El-Achkar, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicrochannelElectrodeVoltageMaterials scienceLab-on-a-chipChipBiosensorMixing (physics)MicrofluidicsNanotechnologyDielectrophoresisOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose in this paper a platform for bioparticles mixing and detection in Lab-on-chip (LoC) based device dedicated to neurotransmitters analysis. The proposed biosensing device is characterized by a low voltage dielectrophoretic separation using novel L-shape electrodes. In addition to the mixing architecture enabling reaction between different particles, liquid was also sampled using the same electrodes. Our design works with different low voltages depending on particle size. It is tested with microspheres in the range of micrometers with an applied voltage less than 5V. The system dimensions ar e reduced to the minimum size such as it needs only few picolitre liquid samples. In addition to have a better control and separation, it is crucial to design many in-channel electrodes with minimum dimensions. Thus the microchannel includes 32 L-shape electrodes. The width of each electrode is 10 μm separated by 10 μm. Consequently, the width of the microchannel is 650 μm. The number of electrodes was choosen based on the number of outputs available on the monitoring electrical circuit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207