Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Concepción during the Maule Earthquake
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detailed observations are reported for eight shear wall buildings from the Concepción region that experienced severe damage during the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake. The repetitive nature of some of the damage suggests that these field observations may be applicable to similar buildings elsewhere, whereas other damage may be unique. Several shear walls experienced failures that apparently started at the boundaries due to the high compression in these unconfined edges, and propagated into the wall web. Other walls, including horizontal and vertical wall segments in perforated walls, experienced shear failure. Damage also was observed in columns, beams, and coupling slabs. In most cases, the percentage of damaged elements was less than 10% of the lateral force‐resisting elements of the building, suggesting that these structures were not capable of distributing damage. Several building indices are calculated, including vibration periods and regularity indices, for comparison with observed behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it