MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117584697 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2011.6030434

Flexible simulation and modeling for 2D topology NoC system design

2011· article· en· W2117584697 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Oveis Gharan, Gul N. Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemCNetwork on a chipNetwork topologyComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Key (lock)System on a chipEmbedded systemComputer architectureTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network on Chip (NoC) is a new paradigm that can solve the problems related to System on Chip (SoC) design. These problems and challenges become more significant when the complexity of SoC increases. The vast volume of these challenges requires a new and flexible NoC test framework (simulator) to be investigated. We have developed a general purpose SystemC based NoC simulator that employs some new approaches to have a superior test system as compared to the past NoC simulators. The simulator mainly target 2D regular NoC topologies where deterministic and adaptive routing techniques that play a key role in the NoC performance. Various NoC design parameters are analyzed by trading off throughputs and latencies. The results show that for some cases the new Line-Probe routing is faster and contention free for local traffic in Torus topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207