MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leptin protects H9c2 rat cardiomyocytes from H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>‐induced apoptosis

2008· article· en· W2117591250 on OpenAlexaff
Megumi Eguchi, Yuan-Tao Liu, Eyun‐Jung Shin, Gary Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsLeptinApoptosisInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhosphatidylserineAnnexinCytochrome cChemistryCell biologyMedicineBiologyObesityBiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is a known risk factor for induction of myocardial infarction, but, paradoxically, may also confer a protective effect against subsequent remodeling leading to heart failure. In this study, we investigated the effect of leptin, the product of the obese (ob) gene, on cardiomyocyte apoptosis, a well-characterized component of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Exposing H9c2 cells to H(2)O(2) decreased cell viability, and this was attenuated by pretreating cells with leptin for 1 h, but not 24 h. Leptin also attenuated the ability of H(2)O(2) to increase phosphatidylserine exposure and annexin V binding. Further investigation of underlying mechanisms of leptin's protective effect demonstrated that the H(2)O(2)-induced decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential (Psi) leading to cytochrome c release was attenuated by leptin pretreatment, and this was associated with reduced translocation of the pro-apoptotic Bax protein to the mitochondrial membrane. Finally, leptin prevented H(2)O(2)-induced increases in caspase-3 cleavage and activity, although again 24 h leptin pretreatment did not confer significant protection. In summary, we have demonstrated that acute leptin pretreatment mediates anti-apoptotic effects in H9c2 rat cardiomyocytes, which may be of significance in clarifying the direct impact of leptin on the heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207