Clopidogrel-Precipitated Rhabdomyolysis in a Stable Heart Transplant Patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the case of an orthotopic heart transplant recipient who developed rhabdomyolysis precipitated by the addition of clopidogrel to the existing regimen of cyclosporine and atorvastatin, which had been tolerated for more than 3 years without adverse effects or laboratory evidence of myositis. CASE SUMMARY: Fourteen years after cardiac transplantation, a 58-year-old woman began a planned 4 week course of clopidogrel 75 mg/day following coronary angioplasty and placement of a stent in the left circumflex coronary artery. Almost 4 weeks later, she presented with severe muscle pain and weakness and laboratory evidence of rhabdomyolysis, with marked elevations of plasma creatine kinase (96,000 U/L) and urine myoglobin (332,872 microg/L) as well as early acute renal failure (serum creatinine 2.9 mg/dL). Symptoms and laboratory abnormalities resolved with cessation of cyclosporine, atorvastatin, and clopidogrel. Clopidogrel was not restarted, while atorvastatin and cyclosporine were; the patient had no recurrence of symptoms up to 15 months later. DISCUSSION: Both atorvastatin and cyclosporine, as well as clopidogrel's active thiol derivative, are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme. Cyclosporine is also a moderate inhibitor of this isoenzyme. We postulate that competition between atorvastatin and clopidogrel for CYP3A4 receptors, already partially inhibited by cyclosporine, led to increased atorvastatin concentrations, resulting in the acute onset of rhabdomyolysis. This theory is further supported by the patient's continued ability to tolerate the combination of atorvastatin and cyclosporine, without clopidogrel, on rechallenge. Use of the Naranjo probability scale revealed that rhabdomyolysis was probably precipitated by the addition of clopidogrel to the stable baseline regimen of cyclosporine and atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners must be conscious of the potential for adverse effects when prescribing clopidogrel to heart transplant patients who are concomitantly receiving cyclosporine and a statin. If concomitant administration is required, careful clinical and laboratory monitoring of the patient is necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".