MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117666129 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2011.2157886

Vectorial Low-Frequency MLFMA for the Combined Field Integral Equation

2011· article· en· W2117666129 on OpenAlexaff
Jonatan Aronsson, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipole expansionScalar (mathematics)Electric-field integral equationMathematicsIntegral equationScalar fieldDiscretizationMathematical analysisMethod of moments (probability theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)PhysicsGeometryMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsEstimator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A vectorial Low-Frequency Multi-Level Fast Multipole Algorithm (LF-MLFMA) is proposed for acceleration of interactions resultant from the method of moments (MoM) discretization of the combined field integral equation (CFIE). The derivatives relating the scalar Green's function to its dyadic counterparts are defined via recursive identities for scalar wave functions. The method evaluates the matrix vector product in MoM by performing three scalar LF-MLFMA passes. It is demonstrated to be stable for scatterers spanning up to 110 wavelengths in size. As the method does not impose any restrictions on the depth of the MLFMA tree, it is suitable for the solution of both broadband and multiscale problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207