MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117702973 · doi:10.1142/s0219887815500504

Wave function of the universe from a matrix-valued first-order formalism

2015· article· en· W2117702973 on OpenAlex
S. I. Kruglov, Mir Faizal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinisuperspaceWheeler–DeWitt equationMathematical physicsFormalism (music)PhysicsSuperspaceEigenvalues and eigenvectorsQuantum cosmologyClassical mechanicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum gravityQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the Wheeler–DeWitt equation in full superspace formalism will be written in a matrix-valued first-order formalism. We will also analyze the Wheeler–DeWitt equation in minisuperspace approximation using this matrix-valued first-order formalism. We will note that this Wheeler–DeWitt equation, in this minisuperspace approximation, can be expressed as an eigenvalue equation. We will use this fact to analyze the spacetime foam in this formalism. This will be done by constructing a statistical mechanical partition function for the Wheeler–DeWitt equation in this matrix-valued first-order formalism. This will lead to a possible solution for the cosmological constant problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it