MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117747117

FROM ENTREPRENEURSHIP TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: CELEBRATING TEN YEARS OF GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MONITOR

2009· article· en· W2117747117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zoltán J. Ács, José Ernesto Amorós, Niels Bosma, Jonathan Levie

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers of entrepreneurship research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipCompetition (biology)ScholarshipProductivityQuality (philosophy)BusinessEconomic geographyEconomicsMarketingEconomic growthFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper reviews ten years of theoretical and empirical contributions by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor consortium. The evolution of GEM measures of entrepreneurship is tracked, and the quantity and quality of peer-reviewed scholarship based on GEM data and models is assessed. Prospects for the future are noted, as GEM continues to expand and scholars outside the consortium increasingly employ GEM data in their work. INTRODUCTION In this paper, we review the ten years of empirical and theoretical contributions of the GEM project. We do this by first reviewing the main scientific contributions of GEM to date. Second we analyze the evolution of GEM’s main indicators over the 10-year period 1999-2008 and show how some GEM measures effectively could contribute to our understanding of the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development. Finally we highlight recent advances in entrepreneurship measures and propose recommendations that may benefit the GEM project. Entrepreneurs create new businesses, and new businesses create jobs, intensify competition, and may even increase productivity through technological change. This is how entrepreneurship is believed to contribute to economic development. Some studies argue that during the last two decades the development of new technologies, and by consequence the emergence of new business models, has shifted from large corporations to small and new ventures (Audretsch and Thurik, 2001; Thurow, 2003; Wennekers et al., 2005, Amoros and Cristi, 2008). By consequence high levels of entrepreneurship will thus translate directly into high levels of innovation, employment and development (Schumpeter, 1934; Baumol, 2002; Acs and Audretsch, 1988). However, we have much to learn about why entrepreneurship rates differ not only among countries with different development stages but also among regions in a single country, and why not all entrepreneurial efforts have the same impact on economic development. Many of these issues are widely explored by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) research program, which assesses entrepreneurial activity annually in nations and regions of the world. GEM was created in September 1997 by Michael Hay and Bill Bygrave as a joint research initiative by London Business School and Babson College. The project’s success would not have been possible without the tremendous efforts of GEM entrepreneur Paul Reynolds, who was Principal Investigator of the project between 1998 and 2003. The first GEM Global study was conducted in 1999. This first effort analyzed 10 countries: the G7 countries (i.e., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom and United States) and three additional countries, Denmark, Finland and Israel because some researchers of these countries had relevant expertise. 1Acs et al.: CELEBRATING TEN YEARS OF GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MONITORFrontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers of entrepreneurship researchSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207