MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117750426 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1982.1171774

4800 Bps RELP Vocoder using vector quantization for both filter and residual representations

2005· article· en· W2117750426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualAlgorithmVector quantizationQuantization (signal processing)Computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the full description and discusses the performances of a 4800 bit per second residual excited linear prediction vocoder. The LPC analysis is efficiently performed using a type of binary-tree search vector-quantization approach. The technique, which is described in ref (1), uses a set of hyperplane equations to perform a hierarchical pattern classification of the input autocorrelation vector in the autocorrelation space. The end result of the search is the integer i <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</inf> which is the index of the most appropriate (in the Itakura-distance sense) prediction filter out of a set of N preset filters. The search requires only <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">\Log_{2}N</tex> dot products. In this case vector quantization presents two advantages over the classical approach of the Durbin algorithm followed by scalar quantization. First, a faster algorithm is obtained. Second, the same accuracy in filter representation is possible with less bits per second and consequently more bits can be allocated for representing the residual and gain. The residual is vector quantized in the time domain by blocks of 16 the samples according to the approach of ref (2). The 16 sample block is essentially encoded using the integer I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> which is the index of the most appropriate 16-sample waveform out of set of M preset prototype waveforms stored in memory. The paper includes preference testings for comparison with other types of 4800 Kbit/sec vocoders. Some sample recordings will be presented at the conference. Finally, preliminary results in the attempt to implement the vocoder in real time on a MAP 200 array processor are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207