MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117810025

A Model for Increasing Reform Implementation and Teacher Efficacy: Teacher Peer Coaching in Grades 3 and 6 Mathematics.

2008· article· en· W2117810025 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Catherine D. Bruce, John A. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationHumanitiesPedagogyCoachingPsychologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the effects of peer coaching on mathematics teaching practices and teacher beliefs about their capacity to have an impact on student learning. Twelve teachers in grades 3 and 6 participated in a brief but intensive professional development program over six months. The program focused on effective math ‐ ematics teaching strategies and peer coaching opportunities. Data sources included classroom observations, teacher self ‐ assessments, interviews, and field notes. Data were analysed using a two ‐ level qualitative coding strategy with multiple inter ‐ preters. Findings showed that teachers implemented key strategies for effective mathematics teaching, especially in facilitating student interaction and improving the quality of tasks assigned. Key words: mathematics, teaching strategies, professional development Cette etude a trait aux effets de l’enseignement mutuel en mathematiques sur les methodes pedagogiques des enseignants et leurs croyances quant a leur capacite d’avoir un impact sur l’apprentissage de leurs eleves. Douze enseignants en 3 e et 6 e annees ont participe a un programme de perfectionnement intensif sur une periode de six mois. Le programme etait axe principalement sur des strategies efficaces pour l’enseignement des mathematiques et les possibilites d’enseignement mutuel. Les sources des donnees etaient multiples : observation de la classe, auto ‐ evaluation de l’enseignant, entrevues et notes prises sur le terrain. Les donnees ont ete analysees a  l’aide d’une strategie de codage qualitatif a deux niveaux avec de multiples interpretes. Les resultats indiquent que les enseignants ont mis en œuvre des strategies cles pour enseigner efficacement les mathematiques, notamment en facilitant les interactions entre les eleves et en ameliorant la qualite des tâches assignees. Mots cles : mathematiques, strategies pedagogiques, perfectionnement professionnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207