Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coupled THM processes that describe the mechanical behaviour of fluid-saturated porous media are an extension to the classical theory originally proposed by Biot [1]. This extension in now an integral part of geomechanics [2-8], where the concepts are applied in a number of areas, including the deep geological disposal of heat-emitting, high-level nuclear fuel waste, thermal stimulation of resource bearing formations and the use of geologic basins for the permanent storage of greenhouse gases converted to supercritical forms. In addition to the consideration of coupled processes of elastic deformations of the porous skeleton, fluid transport in the pore space and heat transfer encountered in a variety of disciplines in the engineering sciences, it is also essential to accurately evaluate the pore fluid pressure responses where adverse fluid pressures can induce damage in the form of microfracturing of the porous skeletal structure. Investigations dealing with the modelling of THM processes in poro-elastic fluid-saturated media are quite extensive; readers are further directed to recent literature in geomechanics, particularly those conferences devoted to poromechanics and the recent articles on nuclear waste management cited previously, for further information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".