MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117817230 · doi:10.1109/issse.2007.4294413

A Processing Method for Pitch Smoothing Based on Autocorrelation and Cepstral F0 Detection Approaches

2007· article· en· W2117817230 on OpenAlex
Xufang Zhao, Douglas O’Shaughnessy, Nguyen Minh-Quang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech recognitionPitch detection algorithmSmoothingComputer scienceDiscriminative modelCepstrumAutocorrelationIntonation (linguistics)Mel-frequency cepstrumTone (literature)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionSpeech processingMathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chinese is known as a syllabic and tonal language and tone recognition plays an important role and provides very strong discriminative information for Chinese speech recognition [1]. Usually, the tone classification is based on the F0 (fundamental frequency) contours [2]. It is possible to infer a speaker's gender, age and emotion from his/her pitch, regardless of what is said. Meanwhile, the same sequence of words can convey very different meanings with variations in intonation. However, accurate pitch detection is difficult partly because tracked pitch contours are not ideal smooth curves. In this paper, we present a new smoothing algorithm for detected pitch contours. The effectiveness of the proposed method was shown using the HUB4-NE [3] natural speech corpus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207