Commémoration et idéologie nationale en Acadie. Les fêtes du bicentenaire de la Déportation acadienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1955, le peuple acadien organisa de grandioses célébrations afin de souligner le deuxième centenaire d’un événement fondateur de l’identité et de l’histoire acadienne, la Déportation. Les « fêtes du bicentenaire acadien », qu’on qualifia par la suite d’onzième congrès national acadien, attirèrent des milliers d’Acadiens et d’Acadiennes provenant de divers coins de l’Amérique. Le ralliement prit l’allure d’une grande célébration de la survivance acadienne, et ce faisant, véhicula l’idéologie traditionnelle de la survivance développée lors des premiers congrès nationaux acadiens de la fin du XIXe siècle. L’hypothèse avancée ici est que la commémoration du bicentenaire de la Déportation fournit une circonstance favorable pour réitérer l’importance de l’idéologie traditionnelle qui, selon les dirigeants, avait permis la survivance de la communauté acadienne et devait assurer son progrès dans l’avenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".