Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robert H. Jackson will undoubtedly be remembered in history as a founder of International Law. I will always remember him as a kind, gentle man with twinkling eyes. I was fortunate enough to meet a personnel director on her way to lunch who was thinking about how she could find a capable secretary. She needed someone who would be available within a week to accompany first contingent of Justice Jackson's staff, who were leaving for England, to prepare cases against major German War Criminals. I had just returned from two years in Alaska and looked like a likely candidate. She asked if I would consider going out of Country again. I had an interview that afternoon and was busy following week (in addition to my secretarial duties) getting a passport, getting shots and meeting with other seventeen people who would be on that first airplane, which left June 18, 1945 at 2:00 p.m. My first meeting with Justice Jackson was Sunday before departure when we were all invited to his home in McLean, Virginia for a lawn party luncheon. There were swings on large trees in lawn and I remember someone asking if Justice Jackson had grandchildren. He replied, with a decided twinkle in his eyes, the swings are for me ... that's where I do my thinking. After departing from Andrews Air Force Base, we had a stopover at Goose Bay Labrador Air Force Base where Justice Jackson hosted a dinner for group. He was a wonderful host and storyteller with a great sense of humor. Just before we left plane in England, word was passed around that we were all to meet at Claridge's Hotel next morning at 9:00 a.m. to go together to American Embassy to meet John Winant, U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain. I thought it was unusual that whole staff would be presented to our Ambassador, but I soon found that Justice Jackson treated everyone alike, whether you were an attorney, secretary, or diplomat. After prosecution was completed, Roger Barrett and Bill Jackson were assigned to publish actual data from prosecution's case. As Justice Jackson said, no one would believe facts unless they actually had access to documents. Since I worked in document room, I was sent back to Pentagon to assist in compilation of documents, which became a ten-volume (1000 page each) set of books. (1) Needless to say, I became an editor by necessity. This process took about four years and required occasional coordination with Justice Jackson personally. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.103 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".