MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117890971 · doi:10.1080/07060660709507438

Phylogenetic relationship of TJ1 isolate of<i>Banana bunchy top virus</i>from Pakistan by DNA-R sequence analysis

2007· article· en· W2117890971 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Zeeshan Hyder, Saboohi Raza, Syed Muhammad Saqlan Naqvi, Shahid Hameed, Saif Ullah Khalid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPakistan Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyPhylogenetic treeMusaceaeSequence analysisCropBotanyGeneticsDNAGeneAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The disease caused by the Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) is a major problem in banana crops. It spreads either through vegetative propagation of the plant and (or) by means of a vector, Pentalonia nigronervosa. Planting material for banana cultivation was introduced to Sindh (a major banana-growing province of Pakistan) from many countries where BBTV was present. A recent BBTV epidemic in the Sindh region resulted in considerable damage to the banana crop. To determine the probable origin of this epidemic, BBTV was isolated from bananas in Sindh, and the DNA-R of the resulting TJ1 isolate was cloned, sequenced, and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Analysis with the complete sequence of the DNA-R showed that the TJ1 isolate is a member of the South-Pacific group. Analysis with the coding or the conserved regions of the DNA-R supported the same grouping. The TJ1 isolate shows the highest homology with the Egyptian isolate within this group, followed by the Australian and Indian isolates. All these isolates seem to have evolved from a common ancestor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207