Tuning the Photoisomerization of a N^C‐Chelate Organoboron Compound with a MetalAcetylide Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To examine the impact of metal moieties that have different triplet energies on the photoisomerization of B(ppy)Mes2 compounds (ppy = 2-phenyl pyridine, Mes = mesityl), three metal-functionalized B(ppy)Mes2 compounds, Re-B, Au-B, and Pt-B, have been synthesized and fully characterized. The metal moieties in these three compounds are Re(CO)3(tert-Bu2 bpy)(C≡C), Au(PPh3)(C≡C), and trans-Pt(PPh3)2(C≡C)2, respectively, which are connected to the ppy chelate through the alkyne linker. Our investigation has established that the Re(I) unit completely quenches the photoisomerization of the boron unit because of a low-lying intraligand charge transfer/MLCT triplet state. The Au(I) unit, albeit with a triplet energy that is much higher than that of B(ppy)Mes2 , upon conjugation with the ppy chelate unit, substantially increases the contribution of the π→π* transition, localized on the conjugated chelate backbone in the lowest triplet state, thereby leading to a decrease in the photoisomerization quantum efficiency (QE) of the boron chromophore when excited at 365 nm. At higher excitation energies, the photoisomerization QE of Au-B is comparable to that of the silyl-alkyne-functionalized B(ppy)Mes2 (TIPS-B), which was attributable to a triplet-state-sensitization effect by the Au(I) unit. The Pt(II) unit links two B(ppy)Mes2 together in Pt-B, thereby extending the π-conjugation through both chelate backbones and leading to a very low QE of the photoisomerization. In addition, only one boron unit in Pt-B undergoes photoisomerization. The isomerization of the second boron unit is quenched by an intramolecular energy transfer of the excitation energy to the low-energy absorption band of the isomerized boron unit. TD-DFT computations and spectroscopic studies of the three metal-containing boron compounds confirm that the photoisomerization of the B(ppy)Mes2 chromophore proceeds through a triplet photoactive state and that metal units with suitable triplet energies can be used to tune this system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".